Category Archives: Uncategorized

“modl-making” in the lands of the Econ

For those who did not pursue the links in the Larry Boland CR Scholar post, you missed a treat in the anthropological study of the economists. A sample:

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The creative function of criticism

This is lifted from a paper on  Popper’s evolutionary theory of knowledge, prepared for a short radio talk. The paper started with the four-stage problem-solving schema P -> TS -> EE -> new P and there were four aims.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The GMU Program

The GMU Program is a label that I used for a line of research that links theory and practice in the appropriate manner. It comes from the work that is done by a mix of Austrians, quasi-Austrians and fellow travellers … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Learning to think – a blast from the past

This is a summary of a really helpful paper which introduced the idea of problem-solving as a feature of effective thinking and learning. The paper was in a collection of papers that I bought from the remaindered books table in … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Debating Lord Chimp on the thoughts of Hans-Hermann Hoppe

Amazon has added permalinks and also the opportunity for comments on reviews. A couple of people  have responded to a comment that I posted on a review of a book by Hans-Hermann Hoppe. These are the three comments. This is … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Among the Wittgensteinians

Taking up Tony Lloyd’s comment on Ryle’s review of The Open Society and its Enemies, and the hint that there were juicy anti-Wittgenstein notes. One of Wittgenstein’s followers, Rush Rhees, was so angry with Ryle’s review that he sat down and … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

O’Hear on Popper and induction

O’Hear wrote a book called Karl Popper (1980) in The Arguments of the Philosophers Series. He argued that we cannot do without both justification and induction. Since that time he has been immune to the counter-arguments of non-justificationists. The following extracts … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Why bother to defend CR and Popper?

I am just about to address O’Hear’s defence of induction in reply to Popper. But first a check on the problem. What is the point of mounting a defence of Popperism, or CR or whatever? Bearing in mind that the … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments

Witty thought for the day

A serious and good philosophical work could be written consisting entirely of jokes. Witt

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Grayling (ed) Philosophy 2

Popper does better in the Index of this volume (compared with one entry and three pages in Vol 1). Here we find pages 63, 201, 235, 237, 238-9 and 461-3. The favourable impression is not supported by the content.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment