Meta
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- So much wilderness, so little reason - The Rabbit Hole on Popper’s institutional turn
- Rod Thomas on ‘Brexit’ and the Political Ideals of the Open Society
- Jorg Wolfgang Huber on Two schools of CR
- David C on ‘Brexit’ and the Political Ideals of the Open Society
- Rod Thomas on ‘Brexit’ and the Political Ideals of the Open Society
books
Archives
- December 2018
- November 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- December 2015
- May 2015
- November 2014
- October 2014
- July 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
Category Archives: Uncategorized
Interesting comments and archival material
This is the transcript of a science show program about Popper on ABC (public) radio, run by an Oxbridge-trained philosopher. There is archival material from the likes of Eccles and more recent contributions from Malachi Hacohen, Jeremy Shearmur and others. In other contexts … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Leave a comment
Pierre Duhem on “good sense”
Someone on the History and Philosophy of Science email list asked for (1) a general introduction to the philosophy of science in the 20th century and (2) something on Pierre Duhem’s thoughts on “good sense” in science. By a stroke … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
1 Comment
How the Austrians can get more value from Popper
Sometimes I want to talk about CR rather than Popper, to “de-Popperize” CR and give more credit to others but still Popper is the 800lb gorilla in the room. It is amusing to see the lengths that the philosophers have gone … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
23 Comments
Welcome to Justin Cruikshank
Justin Cruikshank came to my notice last week when I checked out Philosophy of the Social Sciences at the university library. You can read the abstract of the paper here, with notices of other recent works including a book of essays on … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Leave a comment
Battle for open society almost lost for want of playing fields in Vienna
There is an old saying that the Battle of Waterloo was won on the playing fields of Eton, falsely attributed to the Duke of Wellington, the Iron Duke who presided over the event. I suppose it means that battles are won by teamwork … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Leave a comment
London Libertarian Conference
Sometimes I wonder about the libertarian movement, how it is going world-wide – numbers, influence, key figures, new ideas etc. Anyway, this is a London event billed as the most glittering libertarian event on the Continent. Nice that they think … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Leave a comment
Why scientists like Popper
On the History and Philosophy of Science email list someone wrote: “I always wonder what scientists are claiming when they say they are Popperians. Very few, if any, I have found, eschew confirmation (and positive evidence) in practice. Mostly they … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
11 Comments
The epidemiology of Popperism in Australia
You could say that a Soil Science student in Australia had a better chance of getting a positive introduction to Popper than a Philosophy student. That was when Keith Barley and Geoffrey Leeper were teaching Soil Science.
Posted in Uncategorized
Leave a comment
Rigor and/or rigour
I don’t want to be pedantic about this, it looks as though this is a British/US difference. For those who like to get the full story on these things there is more from Wik.
Posted in Uncategorized
Leave a comment
Rigor and care in analytical philosophy
“Analytic philosophy is not so much a school of thought as a style or method. It is a style of philosophizing which seeks to be rigorous and careful.” A C Grayling in the Introduction to Philosophy 1. “This makes it, … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
6 Comments