Meta
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- So much wilderness, so little reason - The Rabbit Hole on Popper’s institutional turn
- Rod Thomas on ‘Brexit’ and the Political Ideals of the Open Society
- Jorg Wolfgang Huber on Two schools of CR
- David C on ‘Brexit’ and the Political Ideals of the Open Society
- Rod Thomas on ‘Brexit’ and the Political Ideals of the Open Society
books
Archives
- December 2018
- November 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- December 2015
- May 2015
- November 2014
- October 2014
- July 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
Author Archives: Matt
Karl Popper’s nine theses concerning epistemology
It is high time now, I think, to formulate the epistemological results of this discussion. I will put them in the form of nine theses. 1. There are no ultimate sources of knowledge. Every source, every suggestion, is welcome; and … Continue reading
Posted in epistemology
1 Comment
Karl Popper’s 17 theses regarding scientific knowledge
1. All scientific knowledge is hypothetical or conjectural. 2. The growth of knowledge, and especially of scientific knowledge, consists in learning from our mistakes. 3. What may be called the method of science consists in learning from our mistakes systematically: … Continue reading
Posted in science
2 Comments
Notes on essentialism
[I compiled these notes February of 2003. There are several things I would revise now, and some specific points where I feel I am in error. However, there are a lot of nice quotes here and plenty food for thought, … Continue reading
Posted in essentialism
1 Comment
Notes on Karl Popper’s "Towards a Rational Theory of Tradition"
I consider this to be one of Popper’s more important essays, which is why I provide some rough study notes here. I highly recommend people read this essay. It is contained in Conjectures and Refutations, pages 162 to 182. 1. … Continue reading
Posted in epistemology
Leave a comment
Some notes on rationality
CRist (critical rationalist) – A person who does NOT hold a theory of rationality. TRist (traditional rationalist) – A person who does hold a theory of rationality. A CRist needs to distinguish between the truth and falsity in every case, … Continue reading
Posted in epistemology
3 Comments
WW Bartley,III on the implications of the Wittgensteinian problematic
Under the approach stemming from the later writings of Wittgenstein, each discipline or field or ‘language game’ or ‘form of life’ is alleged to have its own ungrounded ultimate standards or principles or ‘logic’, embedded in action, which need not … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Leave a comment
Truth as a human value
There are some people who insist that the truth of values must be demonstrated in someway. Here I have a created a dialog between one such person and a critical rationalist. Can you guess which is which? A: Demonstrate the … Continue reading
Posted in epistemology
1 Comment