Meta
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- So much wilderness, so little reason - The Rabbit Hole on Popper’s institutional turn
- Rod Thomas on ‘Brexit’ and the Political Ideals of the Open Society
- Jorg Wolfgang Huber on Two schools of CR
- David C on ‘Brexit’ and the Political Ideals of the Open Society
- Rod Thomas on ‘Brexit’ and the Political Ideals of the Open Society
books
Archives
- December 2018
- November 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- December 2015
- May 2015
- November 2014
- October 2014
- July 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
Monthly Archives: April 2014
The Minimum Requirement for an Adequate Critique of Popper
Looking through the misreadings of Popper that are collected in my forthcoming book, the following thoughts occurred about the work required for a good critique. Whether not commentators agree with Popper’s views, if they write about him they need to read all … Continue reading
Posted in epistemology
4 Comments
Popper’s view of neo-Darwinian evolutionary theory
HELP WANTED AGAIN. In Unended Quest Popper questioned the scientific status of evolutionary theory which he regarded as a metaphysical research program. Some time later he changed his mind and agreed that aspects of evolutionary theory can be tested and … Continue reading
Posted in epistemology
11 Comments
Persisting with a refuted theory
Popper was prepared to allow a little dogmatism to persist with a theory that appeared to be in trouble with anomalies. Bartley wrote that this did not need to be described in terms of dogmatism, instead we would just accept … Continue reading
Posted in epistemology
Leave a comment
Help wanted
Can someone recall the source of this Popperism? I suggest that much confusion is due to the tendency of attributing to Science (with a capital S) a kind of omniscience and I suggest that this theological view of science ought … Continue reading
Posted in epistemology
1 Comment
Conclusion of Misreading Popper
Frank has put me under pressure to finish my book, so I have made the concluding chapter very short so I can get done this weekend (more realistically, this week). The book starts with a run through Popper’s progress, the … Continue reading
Posted in epistemology
Leave a comment
Popper on creativity and scientific discovery
As I reach the end of my booklet Misreading Popper the thought occurs that some kind of constructive and forward-looking conclusion is required, in addition to challenging the philosophers to read Popper more carefully. So I want to say that … Continue reading
Posted in epistemology
1 Comment
Goodman’s grue emeralds and the “new riddle of induction”
The grue emerald problem surely ranks with the Gettier problem as a red herring of the first order, generated by the misguided quest for confirmation, like Hempel’s paradox of the ravens. The paradox of the ravens means that the existence of … Continue reading
Posted in epistemology
1 Comment
Alex Rosenberg, Philosophy of Science: a contemporary introduction, 2nd ed. 2005 reprinted in 2010
The first edition was published in 2000 in the Routledge Contemporary Introductions to Philosophy Series. Philosophy of Science: Contemporary Readings (eds Balashov and Rosenberg, 2004) is a companion anthology. After a chapter on scientific explanation and a chapter on the … Continue reading
Posted in epistemology
Leave a comment
Peter Godfrey-Smith, 2003, Theory and Reality: an introduction to the philosophy of science
The author took his first degree in Sydney and is a Distinguished Professor in Philosophy in the Graduate Centre at the City University of New York. His book Darwinian Populations and Natural Selection won the 2010 Lakatos award. This book is an … Continue reading
Posted in epistemology
Leave a comment