Meta
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- So much wilderness, so little reason - The Rabbit Hole on Popper’s institutional turn
- Rod Thomas on ‘Brexit’ and the Political Ideals of the Open Society
- Jorg Wolfgang Huber on Two schools of CR
- David C on ‘Brexit’ and the Political Ideals of the Open Society
- Rod Thomas on ‘Brexit’ and the Political Ideals of the Open Society
books
Archives
- December 2018
- November 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- December 2015
- May 2015
- November 2014
- October 2014
- July 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
Monthly Archives: March 2014
Wedberg on positivism and logical empircism
The collection of misreadings of Popper will be supplemented by a some examples where Popper is not mentioned at all (where he should be). The Swede Anders Wedberg wrote three volumes on the history of philosophy with the third covering the … Continue reading
Posted in epistemology
1 Comment
Popper’s rules of the game of science
The role of institutions and conventions (rules of the game) The recognition of the social factor in science is often attributed to Kuhn and the sociologists of knowledge, however Jarvie in The Republic of Science (2001) identified what he called … Continue reading
Posted in epistemology
2 Comments
Kuhn’s misreading of Popper
Kuhn wrote an essay for the Schilpp volume on Popper which appeared in 1974 and it was published in Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge (eds Lakatos and Musgrave) which appeared earlier (in 1970) due to delays in production of the … Continue reading
Posted in epistemology
9 Comments
The New Popper Legend, updated
In the Schilpp volume Popper described the “Popper Legend” that he was a positivist with a different take on the criterion of meaning. In his reply to critics he listed numerous philosophers of the highest international esteem who contributed to the Legend and … Continue reading
Posted in epistemology
1 Comment