Meta
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- So much wilderness, so little reason - The Rabbit Hole on Popper’s institutional turn
- Rod Thomas on ‘Brexit’ and the Political Ideals of the Open Society
- Jorg Wolfgang Huber on Two schools of CR
- David C on ‘Brexit’ and the Political Ideals of the Open Society
- Rod Thomas on ‘Brexit’ and the Political Ideals of the Open Society
books
Archives
- December 2018
- November 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- December 2015
- May 2015
- November 2014
- October 2014
- July 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
Monthly Archives: February 2010
Critical Preferences
What problem is the idea of a “critical preference” intended to solve? (And how does it solve it?) I think the problem is this: We form theories to solve our problems, and we criticize them. Sometimes we decisively refute a … Continue reading
Posted in epistemology
6 Comments
Popper’s Indeterminism
I read Popper’s The Open Universe for the first time yesterday. What do you think of Popper’s arguments against determinism, especially the metaphysical variety? Although I appreciate Popper’s critique of “scientific” determinism, I confess to assuming that some kind of metaphysical determinism is … Continue reading
Posted in CR scholars, science
17 Comments
Force and Charity
Rafe champion writes: Welfare is a sticking point for many people of good will who support freedom but believe that they cannot be libertarians because of all the poor people who need assistance. Actually support for deserving poor people could … Continue reading
Posted in open society
5 Comments
SA in criminology
An excellent paper by Paul Knepper applies Popperian Situational Analysis to criminology. The paper appeared in the Review of Austrian Economics. He provides an introduction to Popper’s ideas about social sciences and the methodology of situational analysis (SA) plus the rationality principle … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
1 Comment
Anthony O’Hear on Popper
Prof O’Hear now at the University of Buckingham wrote the Popper entry in the Oxford Companion to Philosophy edited by Ted Honderich. O’Hear has been writing about Popper for along time, his first major book Karl Popper was published in 1980. It was … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
2 Comments
Hans-Hermann Hoppe getting Popper wrong
Hans-Hermann Hoppe is a leading figure in the group of Austrian economists who are based at the Mises Institute in the US. At one stage of his life he was influenced by Popper but he moved on and his major influences became … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
35 Comments
Explanation versus justification
Many people conflate explanation and justification. An explanation is a theory about why something happened or why we should do one thing rather than another. A justification is a story about why we are right, or probably right, to adopt … Continue reading
Posted in epistemology
12 Comments
What Is Liberalism About?
Rafe Champion writes: [Mirowski] offers a list of eleven tenets of neoliberalism. Some of them are very strange. 1. “The starting point of neoliberalism is the admission, contrary to classical liberal doctrine, that their version of the good society will … Continue reading
Philip Mirowski on Popper and the Mont Pelerin Society
The dustjacket of Mirowski’s collection of essays The Effortless Economy of Science indicates that he questions a host of theories, including the pictures of science put forth by Popper, Polanyi and Kuhn. So he is a polymath and a giant killer. … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
5 Comments
Sir Peter Medawar on scientific method
Deductivism in mathematical literature and inductivism in scientific papers are simply the postures we choose to be seen in when the curtain goes up and the public sees us. The theatrical illusion is shattered if we ask what goes on … Continue reading
Posted in science
Leave a comment